- From: Arnoud <galactus@htmlhelp.com>
- Date: Wed, 01 Jan 1997 21:44:00 +0100
- To: www-html@www10.w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- In article <199612312137.VAA16879@curia.ucc.ie>, Peter Flynn <pflynn@curia.ucc.ie> wrote: > I do really wish we could get away from this idea that 3.2 has some > kind of validity as a "standard" for HTML. Fine, then please suggest something else that the average HTML author should use. For many people, the only way to make sure they write valid HTML is to use a validator. I really can't write 1,200 documents without some way of automated syntax checking. To make this useful, the validator has to support the "latest" elements and attributes. I think that HTML 3.2 provides a good overview of what currently can be done, so that is why I recommend it as the HTML level to validate against. Galactus - -- E-mail: galactus@htmlhelp.com .................... PGP Key: 512/63B0E665 Maintainer of WDG's HTML reference: <http://www.htmlhelp.com/reference/> Ceterum censeo CLASS addendum HTML 3.2 esse. -----END PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Received on Wednesday, 1 January 1997 16:07:57 UTC