- From: Peter Flynn <pflynn@curia.ucc.ie>
- Date: 29 Oct 1996 21:52:22 +0000 (GMT)
- To: chris@w3.org
- Cc: www-html@w3.org, jeff@netscape.com
> Best reason I know: there's no money in it in the short term. Wheras there is money in spacer? Sure there is. You can milk the marketing departments of large corporations for huge sums by letting them continue to think the Web is some kind of remote-control DTP system that lets their designers get near-WYSIWYG by buying products which support things like SPACER. [PNG] So yes, there is money in it, actually. Perfectly true, but I'm not sure this has percolated into the design departments yet. They're still reeling from the shock of having to use funny cross-platform stuff like GIF and JPG instead of TIFF and PICT (no flames, please, TIFF is NOT as portable as some people like to claim). As to why they won't support it, well I can't speak for Netscape. There is a royalty free cross-platform ANSI C implementation they could just link in. I don't know. Perhaps someone from Netscape would care to comment? I'd be interested to hear, but I'm sure that they know what they're doing. ///Peter
Received on Tuesday, 29 October 1996 16:50:23 UTC