- From: Simone Demmel <neko@greenie.muc.de>
- Date: Thu, 24 Oct 1996 11:16:39 +0200 (MET DST)
- To: I.End@bigpic.com
- Cc: www-html@w3.org
Hi,
Imagination's End wrote:
> <IMG SRC="testimgp.jpg" WIDTH=590 HEIGHT=387 USEMAP="#MAP">
> <MAP NAME="MAP">
> <area shape=rect coords="100,100,400,400" alt="Area 1" href="area1.html">
> <area shape=rect coords="200,200,300,300" alt="Area2" href="area2.html">
> </MAP>
> STandard behaviour is to have Area #1 obscruing Area #2, but is that
> supposed to be what happens? It doesn't it seem intuitive that as
> areas are created they are put further behind in the Z-Order.
It seems to be that the browser interpretes the first matching field, he
can find. That means:
100,100,200,200
120,120,190,190
will never see the area in 1200,120,190,190.
120,120,190,190
100,100,200,200
in this case the area 120,120,190,190 will be interpreted correctly.
This beahvior is only a TEST!!! Netscape is doing it like this, and I
have also seen this beahvior on Server-Sided immagemaps.
(I think it is easier to implement like this)
neko
--
Wenn ich schon klicken muss, dann will ich auch ein Bildchen haben ...
(Gert zum fehlen der Bildchen im Directory-Listing vom FTP-WEB-Server)
***
neko@greenie.muc.de Simone Demmel Muenchen (Germany)
Fax.: 089/354 59 80
http://greenie.muc.de/~neko/
Member of The HTML Writers Guild (http://guild.infovav.se/)
Received on Thursday, 24 October 1996 05:18:22 UTC