- From: Peter Flynn <pflynn@curia.ucc.ie>
- Date: 15 Oct 1996 08:40:56 +0100
- To: marc@ckm.ucsf.edu
- Cc: www-html@w3.org
> Why can't you represent footnotes in the following form: > > You can find out about named links from the HTML 2.0 page at the W3C > <A HREF="http://www.w3.org/pub/WWW/MarkUp/html-spec/html-spec_5.html#SEC5.7.3" > REV="footnote"> > <sub>1</sub> > </A>. Nothing wrong with that, if your footnote is instantiated as a separate page, but as I understand it, it would be REL=footnote, rather than REV. REV=footnote would mean that your document was the footnote to the W3C HTML Spec. Footnotes usually use <sup>, but it would be a useful practice if <fn> caused a <sup> and leave the way clear for you to use <sub> with <a>. ///Peter
Received on Tuesday, 15 October 1996 06:25:11 UTC