- From: Daniel W. Connolly <connolly@beach.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 10 Jul 1996 17:33:43 -0400
- To: smishra@cc.gatech.edu
- cc: www-html@w3.org
In message <199607101547.LAA13862@cleon.cc.gatech.edu>, Sunil Mishra writes: >\\ >\\ It's not a parser's job to make sense of HTML. That is up to the >\\ renderer. It seems reasonable to me that you can safely ignore form >\\ tags which do not appear inside a form. >\\ >\\ Galactus >\\ > >True, but HTML 2.0 offered a perfectly good way out of this situation >without introducing this kind of ambiguity. They added an inclusion to the >form element in the DTD. > ><!ELEMENT FORM - - %body.content -(FORM) +(INPUT|SELECT|TEXTAREA)> > >Why wasn't the same method followed for HTML 3.2? I mean, was there a >reason, or was this just an oversight? There was a reason: with client-side scripting, it begins to make sense to have form field elements outside of <form> elements. Dan
Received on Wednesday, 10 July 1996 17:33:37 UTC