- From: Stephen Turner <S.R.E.Turner@statslab.cam.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 24 Nov 1995 11:07:56 +0000 (GMT)
- To: MEZZETTI@pdmat1.math.unipd.it
- Cc: www-html@w3.org
MEZZETTI@pdmat1.math.unipd.it wrote: -> -> 3 - HEADINGS -> ============ -> -> --A heading level must be choosen in strict hierarichical order, -> not on the basis of a particular visual effect.-- Perfect: I totally agree with -> this statement. Thus, I always use a level 1 heading for the title of the whole -> document, then several level 2 headings for the title of "chapters", and so on. -> It's not much important, but this seems inelegant to me: I feel that a level -> --zero-- heading should be used for the title of the whole document, level 1 -> headings for the title of chapters, and so on. A typical document should -> include at most one level 0 heading (e.g., the title of a book), or no level 0 -> headings at all (e.g., if the document contains only a chapter of a book). -> Leaving elegance aside, this is impractical as it would require rewriting most HTML documents currently in existence! -- Stephen R. E. Turner Stochastic Networks Group, Statistical Laboratory, University of Cambridge e-mail: sret1@cam.ac.uk WWW: http://www.statslab.cam.ac.uk/~sret1/home.html "I always keep one big file in case I run out of space." A colleague of mine
Received on Friday, 24 November 1995 06:19:09 UTC