- From: Robert Hazeltine <rhazltin@zeppo.nepean.uws.edu.au>
- Date: Fri, 17 Nov 1995 00:30:37 +1000 (EET)
- To: Joe Budge <budge@clark.net>
- Cc: Davide Musella <davidmsl@anti.tesi.dsi.unimi.it>, www-html@w3.org
On Wed, 15 Nov 1995, Joe Budge wrote: > > From: davidmsl@anti.tesi.dsi.unimi.it (Davide Musella) > > Subject: Meta Tag - proposal (suggestions ???) > > To: www-html@w3.org (Mailing list di html) > > Date: Mon, 13 Nov 1995 12:29:33 +0100 (MET) > > Organization: Dept. of Computer Science, Milan, Italy. > > > Request for comments, suggestions, etc... > > The META tag could benefit greatly from HTTP-EQUIV's for "revision" > (as in 'revision number') and 'timestamp' (as in 'date/time the > document was authored'). > > Librarians -- electronic or otherwise -- keep track of different > versions of a document in many professions. This is crucial in > situations where one needs to track changes in documents over > time -- as frequently happens in legal, engineering, purchasing, and > technical support activities. I would rate the importance of these > as "high" since one cannot do serious document management > without these concepts. Yes, this is very important. > An interesting "nice" feature would be an HTTP-EQUIV for 'period' (as > in 'the document covers the stated period'). This would be used to > organize information so that one can organize/retrieve by historical > time period (eg: "give me all documents where 'title' contains > 'United Nations' and 'period' contains '1945'). Yes, this would be nice but I would not consider it for reasons of simplicity. Rob...
Received on Thursday, 16 November 1995 08:32:05 UTC