- From: Joe English <joe@trystero.art.com>
- Date: Fri, 15 Dec 1995 10:41:09 PST
- To: www-html@w3.org
- Cc: connolly@beach.w3.org
Daniel W. Connolly <connolly@beach.w3.org> wrote: > In an effort to: > (1) get folks to validate documents that use stuff beyond HTML 2.0 > (2) get folks include a DTD when proposing a new feature > (3) learn what document structures are supported by authoring tools > (4) specify uses of the text/html media type for stuff beyond html 2.0 > I'm collecting HTML DTDs and DTD fragments, and putting them on the web. It's > not a registry yet, but it could become one if that looks valuable. I have written a preliminary DTD for Netscape Frames. Details are at <URL:http://www.art.com/~joe/frames/>. This is a just a wrapper around the HTML 2.0 DTD, so it does not include any Netscapisms other than Frames. (The comments in the DTD say that it is known by the FPI "-//Netscape//DTD HTML with Frames//EN", although to my knowledge Netscape has *not* approved it and does not support it. I should probably change the owner identifier; any suggestions as to what I should use?) I've also got a wrapper that adds the Tables fragment from draft-ietf-html-tables-02.txt with the RFC1866 DTD; I can send you that too if you don't already have one. > I'd also like to get folks to say what DTD their documents conform to, ala: > > <!doctype HTML system "http://www.w3.org/pub/WWW/MarkUp/html3/html3.dtd"> > <title>...</title> > ... > > or perhaps even: > > <!doctype HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 24-March-96//EN" > http://www.w3.org/pub/WWW/MarkUp/html3/html3.dtd"> > <title>...</title> This is an excellent suggestion. --Joe English joe@art.com
Received on Friday, 15 December 1995 13:41:34 UTC