- From: Daniel W. Connolly <connolly@beach.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 15 Dec 1995 00:37:52 -0500
- To: Abigail <abigail@tungsten.gn.iaf.nl>
- Cc: www-html@w3.org
In message <199512150500.GAA17382@tungsten.gn.iaf.nl>, Abigail writes: >Daniel W. Connolly wrote: > >[ Example using Netscapisms and a <!doctype> deleted ] > >++ >++ I'm curious about what folks mean by: >++ >++ "-//IETF//DTD HTML 3.0//EN" >++ >++ As far as I know, there's no HTML 3.0 DTD that the IETF owns. In > >Hmm, I have sgmls installed on my system, and that uses a catalog file, >which contains, among others, the line: > -- $Id: catalog,v 1.1 1994/10/07 21:35:07 connolly Exp $ -- > >It also lists "-//IETF//DTD HTML 3.0//EN" as the most general way to >refer to level 3 html. ... >Now, I do not know whether IETF owns an HTML 3.0 DTD, but if >"-//IETF//DTD HTML 3.0//EN" is not a correct way to refer to that DTD, >then why is it listed in the sgmls catalogue file? I just checked, and my v1.1 catalog file has no HTML 3.0 entry. Somebody has edited that file since I released it. Here's the md5 sum of my 1.1 catalog: connolly@beach ../html-spec[641] cvs update -p -r1.1 catalog | md5sum =================================================================== Checking out catalog RCS: /afs/w3.org/hypertext/WWW/MarkUp/Repository/html-spec/catalog,v VERS: 1.1 *************** 51e8e53e108e3cfad03d209e4358b81a - Dan
Received on Friday, 15 December 1995 00:37:59 UTC