- From: Anne van Kesteren <fora@annevankesteren.nl>
- Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 13:51:31 +0200
- To: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- CC: Jim Ley <jim.ley@gmail.com>, www-html-editor@w3.org, xhtml2-issues@hades.mn.aptest.com
Shane McCarron wrote: >> As I have explained, there is no mechanism for the author to >> control the rendering in CSS environments, that is compatible with >> the two views. I reject the issue as there is no technical way an >> author can achieve the required sizing if they do have different >> sizes. > > I understand that you disagree with this decision, and have noted it > in the database. I agree with the disagreement and object to the decision of the HTML WG. There has been some activity on www-style to found a solution for this problem as it clearly doesn't solely apply to XHTML 2.0 — think of xhtml1:img, xhtml1:object — and I believe the outcome of that was that it doesn't fit in the CSS model. I hope the HTML WG can discuss this with the CSS WG to find a feasible solution before XHTML 2.0 enters last call or propose another mechanism for embedding. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/>
Received on Saturday, 28 May 2005 12:00:44 UTC