Re: Sending XHTML 1.1 as text/html

• From: Aaron Reed <aaronr@us.ibm.com>
• Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 12:05:15 -0600
• To: www-forms@w3.org
• Message-ID: <erkm4k$amp$1@sea.gmane.org>

Hi Victor,

Here is one man's opinion: http://www.hixie.ch/advocacy/xhtml

--Aaron

victor@method.se wrote:
> Hello!
> 
> I'm wondering why it's bad to send a XHTML 1.1 page as text/html instead of XML?
> I mean, is it mainly because one of the most popular web browser (not mentioning 
> it) can't understand it? Or is it more than that, like security issues?
> 
> I have a website www.method.se which perfectly validates as XHTML 1.1 even though I 
> send it as text/html. I developed it with semantics and usability in mind. Should I 
> rather use XHTML 1.0 Strict instead?
> 
> Best regards,
> Victor Norgren
> Method of Sweden - Designa en egen skräddarsydd kostym
> http://www.method.se
> 
> 
> 
> 

Received on Thursday, 22 February 2007 18:11:47 UTC