- From: Erik Bruchez <ebruchez@orbeon.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 15:58:31 +0100
- To: www-forms@w3.org
Guntis, > Thank you for an interesting discussion on "Readonly, relevant > attributes for trigger". This, however, is not the most painful > issue with xforms, because number of triggers is usually low > compared to the number of inputs. The most painful issue is (hush > hush taboo) You-Know-Which-One... (see posts Monday, 12 February) There is no taboo in the XForms Working Group. Heck, the group is even talking about HTML 5 and Web Forms 2.0 from time to time, that's telling you how open-minded we are ;-) > I've included an example (more or less typical), see below. The > simplest of forms, nothing special. Could I do better? Beautiful MVC > to some, error-prone bloated useless spaghetti to me. This problem > has not been touched since 2002, I am worried about the next five > years. > > The problem very simple, has number of simple solutions, and must be > addressed to add some value to the new spec. Are we all connected to > the same reality? Do you use xforms in production? What kind of > forms do you design, if showing an appropriate message is not > important? Please respond, I won't be trolling anymore. I don't see any trolling. Suggestions are always welcome. Don't take a lack of feedback as an admission from XForms users or Working Group members that your problem is not a problem. You can also send more formal requests to the working group at: www-forms-editor@w3.org -Erik -- Orbeon Forms - Web Forms for the Enterprise Done the Right Way http://www.orbeon.com/
Received on Wednesday, 21 February 2007 14:58:34 UTC