Funnily enough, a similar discussion is going on in the TAG. See for instance http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2007Apr/0031.html Steven On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 18:02:12 +0200, Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@x-port.net> wrote: > > Hello, > > I'd like to suggest that we have a version attribute that can be used > on any element in a host language. This would therefore be a global > attribute in the XForms namespace, and might be used as follows: > > <html xf:version="1.1"> > ... > </html> > > My feeling is that this attribute is less about enforcing behaviour of > processors, and more about providing a clear indication to authors > which type of document they are dealing with. > > For example, if a form contains a submission that uses the new > xf:resource attribute or element, it may not be immediately obvious to > a new author as they start to learn XForms, that this is not supported > in all processors. Rather than having a flurry of emails on one or > other list saying that some example doesn't work, I think we should > encourage authors to indicate what standard is being used by a form. > > Regards, > > Mark >Received on Thursday, 5 April 2007 12:15:38 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:37:56 UTC