- From: T. V. Raman <raman@users.sf.net>
- Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 12:08:11 -0700
- To: ebruchez@orbeon.com
- Cc: www-forms@w3.org
Eric, Far from my asserting that XForms is not a good thing for access -- i spent a lot of time designing it to be good for accessibility. My asertion was about *today*'s implementations. >>>>> "Erik" == Erik Bruchez <ebruchez@orbeon.com> writes: Erik> Raman, Erik> Erik> I don't think that the fact that today's Erik> implementations do not meet accessibility requirements Erik> necessarily means they cannot. At least, I would like Erik> to see compelling arguments in that direction, and Erik> clearer technical details about exactly what is lost Erik> (and shouldn't be lost) by going from XForms to XHTML. Erik> Erik> IE is not supporting XForms anytime soon, and Ajax is Erik> here to stay, which makes this is a very important Erik> topic. Erik> Erik> I think ignorance of the requirements for accessibility Erik> is a more important reason why most Ajax-based web Erik> applications maybe lack in accessibility. We are Erik> unfortunately as guilty as anyone here. Erik> Erik> -Erik Erik> Erik> T.V Raman wrote: >> >>> From what I've seen coming out of some of the server side >> processors, I'm afraid your're correct >> >> Allan Beaufour writes: >> > >> > Since not everybody is using a browser with XForms >> capabilities, if > you want to deploy XForms today, >> server-side transformations might be > needed. But how >> about accessibility? I fear that you loose that then? >> > >> > /me steps aside and hopes for some good answers from the >> server-side crowd :) >> > >> > -- >> > ... Allan Erik> Erik> -- Orbeon - XForms Everywhere: Erik> http://www.orbeon.com/blog/ -- Best Regards, --raman Email: raman@users.sf.net WWW: http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman/ AIM: emacspeak GTalk: tv.raman.tv@gmail.com PGP: http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman/raman-almaden.asc Google: tv+raman IRC: irc://irc.freenode.net/#emacs
Received on Sunday, 14 May 2006 19:08:42 UTC