- From: Thierry Michel <tmichel@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 18:03:53 +0200
- To: <AndrewWatt2001@aol.com>, <www-forms@w3.org>, <www-forms-editor@w3.org>
Moderator: sent to www-forms@w3.org and www-forms-editor@w3.org ----- Original Message ----- From: <AndrewWatt2001@aol.com> To: <www-forms@w3.org>; <www-forms-editor@w3.org>; <xforms@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 4:33 PM Subject: [Moderator Action] 7.3 and 2.2 - Consistency of terms? > > > > In 7.3 we find the phrase "top level element nodes". In 2.2 we have > "top-level" elements. > > A hyphen or no hyphen? > > Also do we need a new term at all? > > The term "top level" is not used in XPath 1.0 as far as I recall. The XPath > 1.0 term for "top level element node" would be "document element node". > > Since 7.2 already refers to instance data as returning a DOM document would > it be better to use XPath terminology in a corresponding way? > > I appreciate that there is a bit of a fudge as to whether an instance data > "document" exists or not prior to serialization but introducing a new term > "top level" seems possibly unhelpful not least since top-level is a > frequently used in the context of XPath XSLT 1.0 term with a different > meaning. > > If "top level" or "top-level" is to be used then consistent usage would be an > advantage. > > Andrew Watt
Received on Tuesday, 3 September 2002 12:04:27 UTC