- From: Thierry Michel <tmichel@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 18:04:32 +0200
- To: <AndrewWatt2001@aol.com>, <www-forms@w3.org>, <www-forms-editor@w3.org>
Moderator: sent to www-forms@w3.org and www-forms-editor@w3.org ----- Original Message ----- From: <AndrewWatt2001@aol.com> To: <xforms@yahoogroups.com>; <www-forms@w3.org>; <www-forms-editor@w3.org> Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 10:36 AM Subject: [Moderator Action] 7.8.1 - property() function - version property > > > > In 7.8.1 reference is made to the version property. The example code seems to > illustrate a situation where the value of the version property is contained > in the instance data. > > This seems to me to be a very odd design. Why, for example, is there not a > version attribute on the xforms:model element with, for version 1.0, the only > legal value specified as "1.0"? Then an XForms processor knows what it is > dealing with - at least as far as the XForms model goes. > > I appreciate that a missing version attribute might by default be interpreted > as "1.0" but why not put a version attribute on xforms:model and give it a > value? > > Andrew Watt
Received on Tuesday, 3 September 2002 12:05:09 UTC