- From: Micah Dubinko <MDubinko@cardiff.com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2002 08:01:58 -0700
- To: "'www-forms@w3.org'" <www-forms@w3.org>
- Cc: "'Thierry Michel'" <tmichel@w3.org>
Regarding issue 69: I am satisfied by the Working Group's resolution to this issue, namely allowing multiple <instance> elements within a single XForms Model, and having a instance() XPath function that returns the root element of a given instance. Thank you, .micah -----Original Message----- From: Thierry Michel [mailto:tmichel@w3.org] Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 4:59 AM To: w3c-forms@w3c.org Subject: Pending responses to XForms 1.0 Last Call Comments As resumed in the responses to XForms 1.0 Last Call Comments tracking document http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/Group/LastCallResponses.html There are 11 remaining pending issues : Message 2: About the new (?) draft 18 january 2002 Message 43: Proposal to allow xsd:anyURI as allowable type for upload Message 47: Re: Proposal to allow xsd:anyURI as allowable type for upload Message 48: Suggestions (final) Message 69: Regarding multiple <instance> Message 74: Comments from www-forms Message 80-19 Message 82: Should we really care about legacy Message 84: Re: FORMs and GET Message 86: About the bind element Message 87: XForms Basic.
Received on Friday, 26 July 2002 11:02:11 UTC