- From: <AndrewWatt2001@aol.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 12:51:26 EDT
- To: www-forms@w3.org
- CC: cassandra@mozquito.com
- Message-ID: <112.17b5de8.287dde0e@aol.com>
In a message dated 11/07/01 16:54:04 GMT Daylight Time, cassandra@mozquito.com writes: > In defense of the Working Group, I think the whole group is very aware > of the fact that the current XForms spec is far from perfect.This is not > because they haven't been trying to make it perfect either (I sit across > from Josef and I can see how much time and effort he puts into this > along with the others!). > > There are many inconsistencies but remember - this is a Work In > Progress. The working group is probably very appreciative of the effort > that the people on this list make to understand what the WG has written. > Your input and experience is invaluable in helping these guys see things > that perhaps they wouldn't see because they are so close to it. Hi Cassandra, What I was posting wasn't intended to be critical. I understood the primary purpose of the list to be gather feedback from those outwith the W3C WG process on the draft as it stood. I was simply trying to say that factually there was an inconsistency. We all come at these things from different angles. Currently I am writing something on XForms and found quite a bit of difficulty joining up some of the loose ends. Sometimes that has been because I have been slow to grasp the meaning of the WD where it has on reflection been clear. On other occasions, as I became more familiar with the WD it seemed to me that things didn't hang together correctly. I think with the June 2001 WD the WG has made a lot of progress. I hope that active feedback will help that development continue apace. Regards Andrew Watt
Received on Wednesday, 11 July 2001 12:52:03 UTC