- From: Neil Walker <neil.walker@mrc-bsu.cam.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 18:02:13 +0100 (BST)
- To: neil.walker@mrc-bsu.cam.ac.uk, www-forms@w3.org, RMcDouga@JetForm.com
I had briefly mentioned indexes, and Rob McDougall replied: > I'm afraid I'm not sure what part of the document you are referring to. > Could you give me a section.subsection reference so that I can understand > the context of this concern? I couldn't find it: that's why I mentioned it! And as this is a data model issue ... As someone who works on many long but uncomplicated forms, I would like it to be possible (but obviously not required) that the definition of the data model for a form is synonymous with defining the structure of a receiving database. To which end a few other facets would be required, such as "part of unique key", and "not to be shown, just defined". For me, this would mean I could handle the database, interface, CGI script in one go - it'd all be in the form. "Part of unique key" becomes more generally useful in multi-page forms and edits to existing data, where you might want to prevent re-editing of the unique key once a database record has been established. But perhaps this is not seen as part of XForms? Yours Neil -------------------------------------------------------------------- Neil Walker tel: +44 (0) 1223 330379 MRC Biostatistics Unit fax: +44 (0) 1223 330388 Cambridge, UK email: neil.walker@mrc-bsu.cam.ac.uk web: http://www.mrc-bsu.cam.ac.uk --------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Tuesday, 9 May 2000 13:03:28 UTC