- From: Rob McDougall <RMcDouga@JetForm.com>
- Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 11:17:50 -0400
- To: "'Neil Walker'" <neil.walker@mrc-bsu.cam.ac.uk>, www-forms@w3.org
> Personally, I don't think it will be possible to write a DTD that has > what EVERYONE wants. I agree with this. Someone once said "The more generally true a statement is, the less useful it is.". I think a similar sentiment applies to DTDs. The more generally applicable a DTD is the less useful it is for any specific purpose. One has to balance general applicability vs. usefulness on a given problem. This is why we use the data model approach in XForms so that someone can define a schema that is specific (and therefore more useful) to a particular form. > Are you just after comments on > named issues at this stage, or are you open to wider changes? We're open to all comments, but keep in mind that human nature being what it is, the wider the suggested change the greater resistance you'll encounter :). > For > example, the data model being developed assumes that the assignation of > a new identifier (order number, transaction number) is done > programatically - hence the concern about restarting a form (*). What > if the index is one or more elements of user-typed data that require > validation? I'm afraid I'm not sure what part of the document you are referring to. Could you give me a section.subsection reference so that I can understand the context of this concern? Thanks, Rob -----Original Message----- From: Neil Walker [mailto:neil.walker@mrc-bsu.cam.ac.uk] Sent: May 9, 2000 6:11 AM To: www-forms@w3.org Cc: neil.walker@mrc-bsu.cam.ac.uk Subject: Re: Save/Persisting form data Robert Fox and Nimrod wrote about possible competing and/or contributing projects. While we're in the mood, maybe I should mention I'm writing an (open source) forms generator? I announced it in a small way a couple of weeks back - announcement follows. It is not meant to be all things to all people, but to help with those routine questionnaires that crop up in survey work. I happened across XForms as I was looking round for a suitable, common, data-entry interface for the next stage. Personally, I don't think it will be possible to write a DTD that has what EVERYONE wants. For example, the world social science community have produced an exhaustive DTD under the Data Documentation Initiative at ICPSR, University of Michigan - http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/DDI/codebook.html - that has all the background needed for permanent cataloguing. 271 tags, mostly repeatable, will be too much for most people! Equally, a small group of market research software vendors have written a stats data file description DTD - http://www.triple-s.org/ - which will be too little for most purposes other than app-to-app file translation. My approach is to generate (a subset of) both DTDs from a high level script. It can also generate static HTML, Latex, some SQL - and is easily extended with new modules to produce new output. Maybe a DTD and a whole raft of XSLTs would be the current approved method - but then the DTD would change with each module added. Given the examples linked from http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/ it should be straightforward to generate HTML and JavaScript, or XML as required. I'll try this next week. I guess I would have "proposed output device" as a module-specific configuration option - it is easy to imagine one data representation, and multiple visual layouts to suit browsers, handhelds, TVs etc.. Anyhow, slight plug aside - and regardless of whether anyone wants to join in my effort - like Robert Fox, I have been developing pragmatic form-generating software for many years now, and "would love to be of assistance if I may in these areas". Are you just after comments on named issues at this stage, or are you open to wider changes? For example, the data model being developed assumes that the assignation of a new identifier (order number, transaction number) is done programatically - hence the concern about restarting a form (*). What if the index is one or more elements of user-typed data that require validation? Yours Neil Walker (*) which I've seen done by issuing a temporary password, BTW. -------------------------------------------------------------------- Neil Walker tel: +44 (0) 1223 330379 MRC Biostatistics Unit fax: +44 (0) 1223 330388 Cambridge, UK email: neil.walker@mrc-bsu.cam.ac.uk web: http://www.mrc-bsu.cam.ac.uk -------------------------------------------------------------------- WHAT: qgen 0.13, a Questionnaire GENerator This is the first public release, and call for early-adopters. WHERE: http://www.mrc-bsu.cam.ac.uk/qgen/ WHY: Fed up with drag'n'drop questionnaire design and layout tools, I wanted something that could produce a printed copy, an HTML representation, a data entry program, inputs to stats packages, an on-line data dictionary and an XML codebook all from the one script. This Tcl package gets most of the way there. REQUIREMENTS: Tcl8.0+, all Tcl code, no compiling required. Tcl is a stunningly good free cross-platform scripting language available from http://www.scriptics.com/ and all good mirrors. Each output type requires a viewing method too - see website for details. NEW COMMANDS: q A Tk-ish question definition command, loads of options, plenty of defaults title, heading, subheading, instruct Macros - lots of q options pre-defined skip, enlargethispage, fill, footer, pagebreak Page layout commands encode, comment, note, bold, emph, typed, center, underline, big, small, rule, space, rulefill, dotfill, spacefill, tab, ldots, newline, copyright, pounds. Markup qconfigure, pconfigure, preamble, endindex, missvalues, end Configuration and data management commands input, only Legitimised hacks METHOD: Each type of output has its own generator and markup package, such that: q -name FOO -text {[bold "Some question text"]} \ -values {0 No 1 Yes 9 "Not known"} does the obvious thing in each target language. CONTACT: Neil Walker, neil.walker@mrc-bsu.cam.ac.uk Testers, developers, users all welcome. LICENSE: Free, under Artistic and BSD licenses.
Received on Tuesday, 9 May 2000 11:19:25 UTC