Re: Is there a pure JS implementation of the WOFF2 Brotli codec?

On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Mike Kamermans <nihongo@gmail.com> wrote:

> On the off-chance that anyone knows, fontkit (
> https://github.com/devongovett/fontkit) is currently using an
> emscripten'ed version of the Brotli codec for handling WOFF2 decoding,
> which turns what is a 34MB footprint process without WOFF2 decoding into a
> ~1000MB footprint process with... making it rather unusable for dealing
> with WOFF2 files in any meaningful production setting.
>

That overhead sounds way too high. I guess something is wrong with
emscripten or some other part of the workflow.

Rob
-- 
lbir ye,ea yer.tnietoehr  rdn rdsme,anea lurpr  edna e hnysnenh hhe uresyf
toD
selthor  stor  edna  siewaoeodm  or v sstvr  esBa  kbvted,t
rdsme,aoreseoouoto
o l euetiuruewFa  kbn e hnystoivateweh uresyf tulsa rehr  rdm  or rnea
lurpr
.a war hsrer holsa rodvted,t  nenh hneireseoouot.tniesiewaoeivatewt sstvr
esn