- From: Eric Muller <emuller@adobe.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 10:44:25 -0700
- To: www-font@w3.org
On 7/9/2011 12:59 PM, Jonathan Kew wrote: > <qiuote>...for example: > • Simply inserting a hyphen glyph > • Inserting a hyphen glyph and changing spelling in the divided word parts > • Not showing any visible change and simply breaking at that point > • Inserting a hyphen glyph at the beginning of the new line > </quote> > > it sounds as though U+00AD is not expected to have any visible representation Note that the text is careful to say "Inserting a hyphen glyph" without saying in any way how to find one. That's because the content of the cmap (or its moral equivalent) is a matter for the OpentType (or similar) format, not a matter for Unicode (of course, there are constraints because of the eventual desire to have a Unicode compliant system). Observing that: - it's probably not desirable to end up with a different glyph for an hyphenated word and for a compound word. - the latter is most likely represented in text by U+002D - HYPHEN-MINUS, with U+2010 ‐ HYPHEN a distant second. I am not sure that how viable it is to distinguish all the situations. Eric.
Received on Monday, 11 July 2011 17:44:52 UTC