- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 18:21:10 +0200
- To: Lars Hellström <Lars.Hellstrom@residenset.net>
- CC: www-font@w3.org
On Sunday, June 26, 2011, 10:44:06 PM, Lars wrote: LH> Two short remarks: LH> 1. Rather than having mutually exclusive "SVG " and "SVGZ" tables, I believe LH> the SFNT'ish approach would be to have one "SVG " table with two (or more) LH> different formats: One raw, one compressed. And if the intent is to use WOFF with it then both will end up being compressed anyway. So really only one is needed. LH> 2. It would conversely be interesting to see an XML encoding for the LH> information in SFNT tables (I'm primarily thinking GPOS, GSUB, and friends, LH> as each table has to be specified separately). The last time I checked [oh LH> dear, that is close to two years ago!], there was only one tool around for LH> doing such conversions, and its XML format was completely undocumented. :-( Isn't that what Unified Font Object (UFO) is for? http://unifiedfontobject.org/ http://www.letterror.com/ufo/index.html -- Chris Lilley Technical Director, Interaction Domain W3C Graphics Activity Lead, Fonts Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG Member, CSS, WebFonts, SVG Working Groups
Received on Monday, 27 June 2011 16:21:19 UTC