- From: Lars Hellström <Lars.Hellstrom@residenset.net>
- Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 22:44:06 +0200
- To: www-font@w3.org
Two short remarks: 1. Rather than having mutually exclusive "SVG " and "SVGZ" tables, I believe the SFNT'ish approach would be to have one "SVG " table with two (or more) different formats: One raw, one compressed. 2. It would conversely be interesting to see an XML encoding for the information in SFNT tables (I'm primarily thinking GPOS, GSUB, and friends, as each table has to be specified separately). The last time I checked [oh dear, that is close to two years ago!], there was only one tool around for doing such conversions, and its XML format was completely undocumented. :-( Lars Hellström
Received on Monday, 27 June 2011 15:38:28 UTC