W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-font@w3.org > October to December 2010

RE: Including WOFF in ACID3

From: Levantovsky, Vladimir <Vladimir.Levantovsky@MonotypeImaging.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 08:14:23 -0400
To: Mikko Rantalainen <mikko.rantalainen@peda.net>, "www-font@w3.org" <www-font@w3.org>
Message-ID: <7534F85A589E654EB1E44E5CFDC19E3D04A277047F@wob-email-01.agfamonotype.org>
On Friday, October 22, 2010 9:14 AM Mikko Rantalainen wrote:
> I think that the real fix would be to drop the TTF requirement because
> it cannot fulfill the requirement to "be justifiable using only
> standards that were in the Candidate Recommendation stage or better in
> 2004". At least, if we think that sentence to mean that if the CR or
> higher spec does not mention TTF, then TTF does not exists.

I think that we have reached an agreement on this. Dropping TTF requirement could mean either adding a font resource to the test in an alternative format (WOFF) so that both formats remain optional and a browser supporting either one of those could pass the test (as Sylvain proposed), or removing the test in question altogether. 

What is the next step?

Thank you,
Received on Monday, 25 October 2010 12:17:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:37:35 UTC