- From: Levantovsky, Vladimir <Vladimir.Levantovsky@MonotypeImaging.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 14:30:12 -0400
- To: Mikko Rantalainen <mikko.rantalainen@peda.net>, "www-font@w3.org" <www-font@w3.org>
On Wednesday, October 20, 2010 4:48 AM Mikko Rantalainen wrote: > > I agree that TTF support is not required by any spec in 2004. And the same is true today, in 2010. > ACID 3 should not be retroactively changed > from the original "year 2004 specifications only" rule. > I am not aware of any such rule. The test in question was added in early 2008. > As a result, I think possible choices are TTF only or no @font-face > test at all. > I don't think that "TTF only" is a viable option given that we already established that TTF support is not required and that ACID 3 isn't in a position to mandate it (which is in essence what a UA has to do to pass the test). I do agree that removing the test seems to be the best option, with the understanding that the new ACID 4 tests will be created based on the state of the art technologies being developed and standardized today. Thank you, Vladimir
Received on Wednesday, 20 October 2010 18:37:11 UTC