- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 22:47:26 +0100
- To: Thomas Phinney <tphinney@cal.berkeley.edu>
- CC: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, www-font@w3.org
On Wednesday, March 3, 2010, 5:10:10 PM, Thomas wrote: TP> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 9:48 AM, Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org> wrote: >> The conformance requirement will be that WOFF must be supported and other formats may be supported. So implementations which plan to support it can of course do so. Just like they may already support other formats (EOT, CFF, raw TT/OT, SVG). TP> WOFF is a wrapper format rather than a standalone format. WOFF TP> wrappers can be deployed around any SFNT based font format, including TP> TTF, TTF/OpenType, OpenType CFF, TTF/AAT, TTF/Graphite (and perhaps TP> .dfont?). Yes. TP> I hope the recommendation will include some statements about TP> expectations for underlying format support. Making TTF, TTF/OpenType TP> and OpenType CFF requirements, while allowing others to be optional, TP> would probably be best. I agree that they should. -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Technical Director, Interaction Domain W3C Graphics Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
Received on Wednesday, 3 March 2010 21:47:35 UTC