W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-font@w3.org > April to June 2010

RE: WOFF and extended metadata

From: Levantovsky, Vladimir <Vladimir.Levantovsky@MonotypeImaging.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 12:03:07 -0400
To: Erik van Blokland <erik@letterror.com>, "www-font@w3.org" <www-font@w3.org>
Message-ID: <7534F85A589E654EB1E44E5CFDC19E3D03F3DB5391@wob-email-01.agfamonotype.org>
+1


> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-font-request@w3.org [mailto:www-font-request@w3.org] On
> Behalf Of Erik van Blokland
> Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 11:49 AM
> To: www-font@w3.org
> Subject: Re: WOFF and extended metadata
> 
> 
> FWIW , I think this is the best proposal, for the reasons Jonathan
> lists.
> Erik
> 
> On Jun 21, 2010, at 5:47 PM, Jonathan Kew wrote:
> 
> > In the light of the WG discussions and the messages I've been seeing
> on the mailing lists, I have added a definition of an <extension>
> element to the metadata section of the spec. I'll circulate a new draft
> soon, but in the meantime here is a sketch of what I've currently got
> for the metadata extension:
> >
> > <extension [id="foo"]>
> > <!-- zero or more extension elements allowed within metadata -->
> >
> >  <name [lang="en"]>Name for this extension block</name>
> >  <!-- name of the extension; optional; localizable -->
> >
> >  <item [id="bar"]>
> >  <!-- one or more metadata items within each extension element -->
> >
> >    <name [lang="en"]>Name of this metadata item</name>
> >    <!-- name of the metadata item; required; localizable -->
> >
> >    <value [lang="en"]>Value of this metadata item</value>
> >    <!-- value of the metadata item; required; localizable -->
> >
> >  </item>
> >
> > </extension>
> 
Received on Tuesday, 22 June 2010 16:07:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:37:34 UTC