- From: Erik van Blokland <erik@letterror.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 17:49:26 +0200
- To: www-font@w3.org
FWIW , I think this is the best proposal, for the reasons Jonathan lists. Erik On Jun 21, 2010, at 5:47 PM, Jonathan Kew wrote: > In the light of the WG discussions and the messages I've been seeing on the mailing lists, I have added a definition of an <extension> element to the metadata section of the spec. I'll circulate a new draft soon, but in the meantime here is a sketch of what I've currently got for the metadata extension: > > <extension [id="foo"]> > <!-- zero or more extension elements allowed within metadata --> > > <name [lang="en"]>Name for this extension block</name> > <!-- name of the extension; optional; localizable --> > > <item [id="bar"]> > <!-- one or more metadata items within each extension element --> > > <name [lang="en"]>Name of this metadata item</name> > <!-- name of the metadata item; required; localizable --> > > <value [lang="en"]>Value of this metadata item</value> > <!-- value of the metadata item; required; localizable --> > > </item> > > </extension>
Received on Tuesday, 22 June 2010 15:50:10 UTC