W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-font@w3.org > April to June 2010

Re: WOFF and extended metadata

From: Erik van Blokland <erik@letterror.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 17:49:26 +0200
Message-Id: <B9E78676-CCD3-49BB-B662-9F4E11FF5D46@letterror.com>
To: www-font@w3.org

FWIW , I think this is the best proposal, for the reasons Jonathan lists. 
Erik

On Jun 21, 2010, at 5:47 PM, Jonathan Kew wrote:

> In the light of the WG discussions and the messages I've been seeing on the mailing lists, I have added a definition of an <extension> element to the metadata section of the spec. I'll circulate a new draft soon, but in the meantime here is a sketch of what I've currently got for the metadata extension:
> 
> <extension [id="foo"]>
> <!-- zero or more extension elements allowed within metadata -->
> 
>  <name [lang="en"]>Name for this extension block</name>
>  <!-- name of the extension; optional; localizable -->
> 
>  <item [id="bar"]>
>  <!-- one or more metadata items within each extension element -->
> 
>    <name [lang="en"]>Name of this metadata item</name>
>    <!-- name of the metadata item; required; localizable -->
> 
>    <value [lang="en"]>Value of this metadata item</value>
>    <!-- value of the metadata item; required; localizable -->
> 
>  </item>
> 
> </extension>
Received on Tuesday, 22 June 2010 15:50:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:37:34 UTC