W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-font@w3.org > April to June 2010

Re: WOFF and extended metadata

From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 20:36:53 +0200
Message-ID: <503405644.20100621203653@w3.org>
To: Laurence Penney <lorp@lorp.org>
CC: Liam Quin <liam@w3.org>, James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com>, www-font@w3.org, 3668 FONT <public-webfonts-wg@w3.org>
On Monday, June 21, 2010, 8:14:51 PM, Laurence wrote:


LP> To bring up a real use case:

LP> Let's say that some time hence, because of widespread
LP> badly-formed webfont deployment, it becomes desirable to bundle a
LP> small example XHTML file, or XHTML fragment, in the metadata ...


LP> Should the value be entity-encoded or not?

Why on earth would you want to entiry encode it (or base-64 encode it, or whatever other obfuscation) when it could be included directly?





-- 
 Chris Lilley                    mailto:chris@w3.org
 Technical Director, Interaction Domain
 W3C Graphics Activity Lead
 Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
Received on Monday, 21 June 2010 18:37:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:37:34 UTC