- From: Gustavo Ferreira <gustavo.ferreira@hipertipo.net>
- Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 08:19:57 +0200
- To: www-font <www-font@w3.org>
A user visits a website which uses WOFF fonts. He/she likes the fonts and wants to get more information about them: what's their name? who designed them, when? what is their license? are they free/open? where can I get them? etc. How will he/she get to this info? (Just trying to understand how this would work.) Em 25 mei 2010, ās 23:45, Sylvain Galineau escreveu: >> From: www-font-request@w3.org [mailto:www-font-request@w3.org] On >> Behalf Of Levantovsky, Vladimir > > >> The purpose of this sentence is to provide specify recommended behavior, >> "MAY" has a completely different meaning. > > "MAY" is appropriate. The vast, vast majority of browser users will *never* > look at this information. Ever. I don't think browser vendors should have > to justify not implementing such a specialized metadata feature, yet > SHOULD implicitly requires them to do just that since it is recommended. > > Fonts will still carry your metadata. Web authors will still want to access > it. Browser vendors should be free to expose it in whatever way they wish, > be it as a built-in dialog or an API exposed for applications and add-ons, > or both. Most importantly for the format's adoption, they should be able to > implement this *when* they wish. > > Summary: 1) this block is optional, 2) the invalidity of its content has no > effect on the runtime use of the font data thus 3) recommending a UI mechanism > here is toothless in practice, which means that 4) making this a SHOULD will > likely result in most browsers being both non-conformant and interoperable. > I don't think that's an interesting result from a standardization standpoint. > > If the metadata format is simple and extensible, we're definitely interested in > supporting this eventually. But that is unlikely to be a priority in the first > release that supports WOFF i.e. whether the lack of font metadata info UI makes us > non-conformant with respect to WOFF will be up to web authors. That would make it > a MAY.
Received on Wednesday, 26 May 2010 06:20:58 UTC