W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-font@w3.org > April to June 2010

Re: WOFF and extended metadata

From: James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com>
Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 16:31:58 -0400
To: <www-font@w3.org>
Cc: "Levantovsky\, Vladimir" <Vladimir.Levantovsky@MonotypeImaging.com>, "robert\@ocallahan.org" <robert@ocallahan.org>, Christopher Slye <cslye@adobe.com>, "public-webfonts-wg\@w3.org" <public-webfonts-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <m3vdab90yx.fsf@lugabout.jhcloos.org>
>>>>> "LV" == Levantovsky, Vladimir <Vladimir.Levantovsky@MonotypeImaging.com> writes:

LV> “SHOULD” has a meaning of formal recommendation but gives the UA

Which is exactly what everyone is complaining about.

It SHOULD, at most, be MAY, if it is in the spec at all.

James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com>         OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6
Received on Tuesday, 25 May 2010 21:06:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:37:34 UTC