W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-font@w3.org > April to June 2010

Re: WOFF and extended metadata

From: James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com>
Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 16:31:58 -0400
To: <www-font@w3.org>
Cc: "Levantovsky\, Vladimir" <Vladimir.Levantovsky@MonotypeImaging.com>, "robert\@ocallahan.org" <robert@ocallahan.org>, Christopher Slye <cslye@adobe.com>, "public-webfonts-wg\@w3.org" <public-webfonts-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <m3vdab90yx.fsf@lugabout.jhcloos.org>
>>>>> "LV" == Levantovsky, Vladimir <Vladimir.Levantovsky@MonotypeImaging.com> writes:

LV> “SHOULD” has a meaning of formal recommendation but gives the UA

Which is exactly what everyone is complaining about.

It SHOULD, at most, be MAY, if it is in the spec at all.

-JimC
-- 
James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com>         OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6
Received on Tuesday, 25 May 2010 21:06:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:37:34 UTC