Re: Agenda, action items and suggested WOFF changes

On 17 May 2010 13:19, Levantovsky, Vladimir
<Vladimir.Levantovsky@monotypeimaging.com> wrote:
>
> it would simply not be considered a conformant implementation.

If Ben then publishes that "non conformant implementation," could he be sued?

Received on Monday, 17 May 2010 11:33:18 UTC