W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-font@w3.org > April to June 2010

Re: Agenda, action items and suggested WOFF changes

From: John Hudson <tiro@tiro.com>
Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 10:38:42 -0700
Message-ID: <4BE99622.4070302@tiro.com>
To: "Levantovsky, Vladimir" <Vladimir.Levantovsky@MonotypeImaging.com>
CC: John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com>, public-webfonts-wg@w3.org, www-font <www-font@w3.org>
Levantovsky, Vladimir wrote:

> Regarding the proposed new bit setting and description: The default setting for all reserved bits is currently 'zero'. I am concerned that defining the new bit as proposed ("No web use allowed") would automatically make all existing fonts 'allowed' for web use, which I doubt has ever been an intent. The reversed interpretation "Web use allowed" would be safe with regard to existing fonts, and it would also play nicely with the existing definition of other embedding restrictions, including "Restricted License Embedding" - if both bits are set it would be clearly understood that document embedding is restricted while web use is allowed.

Yes, that is a better idea.

Received on Tuesday, 11 May 2010 17:39:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:37:34 UTC