Re: Next step?

On Oct 22, 2009, at 12:41 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:

>>> WOFF and CWT still need full specs,
>> I think you'll find WOFF has a spec, but CWT hasn't?
> CWT has at least as full of a spec as WOFF does, I believe - it was
> defined in its current form by Daggett.

Really? I remember a loose spec being posted to the list and then  
heavily debated. I don't seem to recall seeing anything official or  
definitive. On the other hand, WOFF has this:


Received on Thursday, 22 October 2009 17:00:01 UTC