RE: Next step? from Levantovsky, Vladimir on 2009-10-22 (www-font@w3.org from October to December 2009)

From: Levantovsky, Vladimir <Vladimir.Levantovsky@MonotypeImaging.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 11:49:39 -0400
To: Chris Fynn <cfynn@gmx.net>, www-font <www-font@w3.org>
Message-ID: <7534F85A589E654EB1E44E5CFDC19E3D10F1EF@wob-email-01.agfamonotype.org>

On Thursday, October 22, 2009 11:26 AM Chris Fynn wrote:
> 
> Levantovsky, Vladimir wrote:
> 
> > Okay, so we both seem to agree that the major goal of the WG is to
> develop/finalize/specify technical solutions that promote/enable
> interoperability in both the near and 'not so' distant future. And,
> taking into account that we already spent almost two years arguing
> about it, makes three-to-five-years time horizon for WOFF adoption 'not
> so distant' in my book (although I would be thrilled to have an "okay
> solution" for web fonts supported *today*, and a "great solution" for
> *tomorrow*, relatively speaking).
>  > Cheers,
>  > Vlad
> 
> Wasn't 'an "okay solution" for web fonts supported *today*' what all
> the
> earlier discussion about EOTLite / CWT was about?
> 

Yes, it was, and I don’t think we should just dismiss it.

Regards,
Vlad

Received on Thursday, 22 October 2009 15:52:24 UTC