RE: Next step?

On Thursday, October 22, 2009 11:26 AM Chris Fynn wrote:
> Levantovsky, Vladimir wrote:
> > Okay, so we both seem to agree that the major goal of the WG is to
> develop/finalize/specify technical solutions that promote/enable
> interoperability in both the near and 'not so' distant future. And,
> taking into account that we already spent almost two years arguing
> about it, makes three-to-five-years time horizon for WOFF adoption 'not
> so distant' in my book (although I would be thrilled to have an "okay
> solution" for web fonts supported *today*, and a "great solution" for
> *tomorrow*, relatively speaking).
>  > Cheers,
>  > Vlad
> Wasn't 'an "okay solution" for web fonts supported *today*' what all
> the
> earlier discussion about EOTLite / CWT was about?

Yes, it was, and I don’t think we should just dismiss it.


Received on Thursday, 22 October 2009 15:52:24 UTC