- From: Chris Fynn <cfynn@gmx.net>
- Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 21:25:38 +0600
- To: www-font <www-font@w3.org>
Levantovsky, Vladimir wrote: > Okay, so we both seem to agree that the major goal of the WG is to develop/finalize/specify technical solutions that promote/enable interoperability in both the near and 'not so' distant future. And, taking into account that we already spent almost two years arguing about it, makes three-to-five-years time horizon for WOFF adoption 'not so distant' in my book (although I would be thrilled to have an "okay solution" for web fonts supported *today*, and a "great solution" for *tomorrow*, relatively speaking). > Cheers, > Vlad Wasn't 'an "okay solution" for web fonts supported *today*' what all the earlier discussion about EOTLite / CWT was about? - Chris
Received on Thursday, 22 October 2009 15:26:21 UTC