Re: Next step?

Dave Crossland wrote:
> 2009/10/22 Chris Fynn <>:
>> Sylvain Galineau wrote:
>>> To be clear, what I am stating is that two is better than requiring 3 or
>>> 4, given that every browser vendor has strong feelings about at least one of
>>> the formats on the list. Sure, it would be great if we could bypass this and
>>> agree on one but I very much doubt this will happen over email; and as
>>> browser vendors will still support their current
>>> features and browsers upgrade at a different pace, authors still need to
>>> deal with what's out there.
>> I'm wondering about SVG Fonts which have hardly been discussed here - can
>> any browser currently use SVG fonts to render text outside of an svg
>> graphic?
> Promoting SVG fonts is A Good Thing?

Well it is one of the "font formats" in the proposal  - I've never seen 
an SVG font outside of an SVG document or graphic ~ so they seem quite 
different from the rest of the formats mentioned which are clearly going 
to be used for displaying HTML / XHTML text.


Received on Thursday, 22 October 2009 14:37:43 UTC