- From: Dave Crossland <dave@lab6.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 14:10:24 +0100
- To: www-font <www-font@w3.org>
2009/10/22 Chris Fynn <cfynn@gmx.net>: > Sylvain Galineau wrote: > >> To be clear, what I am stating is that two is better than requiring 3 or >> 4, given that every browser vendor has strong feelings about at least one of >> the formats on the list. Sure, it would be great if we could bypass this and >> agree on one but I very much doubt this will happen over email; and as >> browser vendors will still support their current >> features and browsers upgrade at a different pace, authors still need to >> deal with what's out there. > > I'm wondering about SVG Fonts which have hardly been discussed here - can > any browser currently use SVG fonts to render text outside of an svg > graphic? Promoting SVG fonts is A Good Thing?
Received on Thursday, 22 October 2009 13:11:19 UTC