- From: John Hudson <tiro@tiro.com>
- Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2009 18:19:52 -0700
- CC: www-font@w3.org
Chris Lilley wrote, 9 September: > Well, I have been putting out some feelers and so far I think a > Working group is doable. Its not me that gets to decide, the W3C > Advisory Committee (AC) does that, but I am currently writing a > proposed charter which I will make available for public review, > hopefully by the end of this week. Expressions of support would help, > once that draft charter is available. How is that charter coming along, Chris? > One way to do that is to review the charter. Another way is to say if > you or your company would be interested in participating. A third way > would be to get submissions of the two new formats (I can help with > that, if the authors want to contact me) which helps demonstrate to > the AC both that there is momentum and also that the Working group > would start with a well defined problem and a good idea of the > solutions. And this? WOFF looks stable enough for formal documentation and submission, and CWT (EOTL as was) is quite well defined. I have a suggestion regarding both, but I'd like to get an idea of where the process is now. John Hudson
Received on Tuesday, 6 October 2009 01:20:27 UTC