- From: Karlsson Kent - keka <keka@im.se>
- Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2000 13:01:31 +0100
- To: www-font@w3.org
- Message-ID: <C110A2268F8DD111AA1A00805F85E58DA6859C@ntgbg1>
> -----Original Message----- > From: erik@netscape.com [mailto:erik@netscape.com] ... > > > BODY { font-family: Verdana; font-size-adjust: first-avail; } > > > > I'm not sure of the implications of that. > > In the above example, if Verdana's ex/em ratio is 0.58, then > "first-avail" is the same as "0.58", except that the style sheet author > doesn't need to figure out Verdana's ratio. The implementation figures > out the ratio by looking at the Verdana font. This makes life > easier for the style sheet author. "first-avail" means nobody knows which ratio, or which size, one finally gets. Naaa. > > 'font-size ex-height <the size asked for>' is > > straight-forward and easy to teach and understand. > > As Clive pointed out, the line-height should not be based on the > ex-height. So now you would need to carefully explain the line-height > issues, so that people don't think that line-height is a factor of > ex-height. I've never ever suggested that it would be a good idea to say "line-height 2ex" (though possible, even now). One should recommend that one uses "line-height 1line" or "line-height 1.2line" or similar, where the unit "line" is the Åp-height(!!!) of the current font. I know, that overloads the notion of "a line" a bit, but people seem to be able to understand expressions like "one and a half line spacing" and "double line spacing". Kind regards /kent k
Received on Friday, 4 February 2000 07:02:27 UTC