- From: David Lemon <typenerd@slip.net>
- Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2000 11:19:15 -0800
- To: www-style@w3.org, "'www-font@w3.org'" <www-font@w3.org>
At 6:21 PM +0100 1/31/00, Karlsson Kent - keka wrote: > In TrueType an em is undefined (it's up to each typeface designer > what it "is"). This *so called* "em" should be left as something > INTERNAL to a font... While TrueType does not explicitly state that the em is euqivalent to the type size, that definition is implicit. TrueType allows the designer/producer to set the number of units per em. This has the effect of establishing the font's coordinate space, because the em is a constant (while units are not). There are many typesetting systems I've not had the priviledge(?) of working with. But in more than twenty years, I've not come across any system other than the old Monotype casters which defined an em as other than the type size. I fail to see any advantages to doing so. - David Lemon
Received on Tuesday, 1 February 2000 14:18:17 UTC