- From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 11:32:51 +0100
- To: "VORA,POORVI (HP-Corvallis,ex1)" <poorvi_vora@hp.com>
- Cc: Dr Mark R Baker <mark.baker@pay2see.com>, www-drm@w3.org
This is really interesting. It show's that the right does not follow the materialization. In fact, copyright just works normally here, as there is a monopoly to produce instances. Once produced, the tangible instances are sold and property of the new owner, that has the right to re-sell the instance, destroy it or whatever... Best, Rigo On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 11:47:39AM -0800, VORA,POORVI (HP-Corvallis,ex1) wrote: > > That brings to mind 3-D printing, where a material object (such as a > cell-phone cover, even an artificial limb) is created with a printer, based > on "3-D printing" a digital asset. It is interesting to see that another > instance of a digital object corresponds to a physical object of a > completely new kind, and, with technology improvements, could correspond to > almost any material object - not just what we think of as `multimedia'/media > asset. It also brings up the issue of the material worth of intellectual > property vs. the material worth of its realization. >
Received on Monday, 11 March 2002 06:41:14 UTC