- From: Olli Pettay <olli@pettay.fi>
- Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 13:10:53 +0300
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>, Elliott Sprehn <esprehn@google.com>, Dominic Cooney <dominicc@google.com>, Domenic Denicola <d@domenic.me>, Ryosuke Niwa <rniwa@apple.com>, Travis Leithead <Travis.Leithead@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "www-dom@w3.org" <www-dom@w3.org>, foolip@chromium.org
The use of mutation events has gone down significantly and if we could get browsers other than just Firefox to warn about use of mutation events, the usage might go down even more. All these deprecations can't work if UAs don't warn about use of such features. -Olli On 08/23/2016 11:23 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > Elliott, you mentioned a few times that you want to slightly change > the timing of mutation events. Is that still in the cards? > > I posted a summary of the current state of things around mutation events here: > > https://github.com/whatwg/dom/issues/305 > > It seems like browsers implement different subsets, so there might be > some room for simplification. But it doesn't seem that the use > counters are low enough for removal for a couple of them so we'll > either have to experiment with timing or just suck it up and define > them as-is. > > Thoughts? > >
Received on Tuesday, 23 August 2016 10:11:29 UTC