- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
- Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 10:53:01 -0400
- To: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, "public-html-admin@w3.org" <public-html-admin@w3.org>
- CC: "www-dom@w3.org" <www-dom@w3.org>
On 5/13/15 10:18 AM, Paul Cotton wrote: > As stated in the Last Call WD, the HTML WG plans to take this > specification directly to Proposed Recommendation status when the Last > Call review is completed. Wait. How does that work? This draft contains things that not only don't have two interoperable implementations but have no implementations at all, as far as I can tell (e.g. ParentNode.query). What's the current state of the test suite and UAs passing it? The draft talks about this being a requirement for entering PR (in the usual way), but I simply don't see how that's possible at the moment given the obvious lack of implementations mentioned above. I wasn't sure pointing this out needed explicit last call comments, but maybe it does. And, of course, there are the remaining open issues that are called out in the draft (Document stuff and createElement issues) and for which it also didn't seem like additional last call comments were needed since the issues are longstanding and well-known. -Boris
Received on Wednesday, 13 May 2015 14:53:31 UTC