- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 09:20:38 -0700
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Cc: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, "www-dom@w3.org" <www-dom@w3.org>, David Håsäther <hasather@gmail.com>
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 6:11 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: >> #1 is what I was intending, but looking at closest() now, I don't see >> a restriction to just compound selectors. If complex selectors are >> allowed, then I guess it makes more sense to match matches() and have >> :scope refer to the element you're matching against. It makes it >> harder to do some things, but they're probably rare and can be handled >> explicitly anyway. > > Hmm yes, so 2) then? :-) Yes, sorry I didn't make that clear. ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 2 September 2014 16:21:26 UTC