- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 18:20:00 +0200
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, "www-dom@w3.org" <www-dom@w3.org>, David Håsäther <hasather@gmail.com>
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 6:11 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > #1 is what I was intending, but looking at closest() now, I don't see > a restriction to just compound selectors. If complex selectors are > allowed, then I guess it makes more sense to match matches() and have > :scope refer to the element you're matching against. It makes it > harder to do some things, but they're probably rare and can be handled > explicitly anyway. Hmm yes, so 2) then? :-) -- http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Tuesday, 2 September 2014 16:20:29 UTC