- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 02:17:29 +0000
- To: www-dom@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23186 Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED CC| |bzbarsky@mit.edu Resolution|FIXED |--- --- Comment #6 from Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> --- > But I don't see the point of allowing this parameter to be non-null. The point would be if there is code on the web that does that and doesn't expect an exception. Given that no UA throws on null here, I don't think the spec should require the throwing behavior, unless you have some sort of indication that it is in fact web-compatible. Which I doubt it is, frankly. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 4 December 2013 02:17:30 UTC