Re: Deprecating Future's .then()

On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Sean Hogan <shogun70@westnet.com.au> wrote:
> Should the spec continue to allow this behavior?
>
> or ...
>
> Should the resolve algorithm - which is currently infinite unwrap for
> accepted / fulfilled futures - also be infinite unwrap for rejected futures?

I'm satisfied with either behavior.  It might be nice to have it
mirror the then/chain behavior, where it fully-unwraps or
single-unwraps as appropriate, but I'd likely be fine with both doing
single-unwrapping or both doing full-unwrapping.

~TJ

Received on Thursday, 6 June 2013 00:57:10 UTC