- From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Date: Wed, 8 May 2013 12:42:29 -0700
- To: Domenic Denicola <domenic@domenicdenicola.com>, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Cc: Mounir Lamouri <mounir@lamouri.fr>, "www-dom@w3.org" <www-dom@w3.org>
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Domenic Denicola <domenic@domenicdenicola.com> wrote: > This is a good illustration of the kind of conflict between DOM API designers and normal ECMAScript semantics. Normal ECMAScript semantics would demand that `undefined` and no parameter be treated the same. That's the agreed upon behavior for WebIDL as way, however I don't think the spec has yet been updated to match that. / Jonas
Received on Wednesday, 8 May 2013 19:43:28 UTC